The two-step reality of a PTSD appeal: what the Board does with these issues, and — when veterans appeal a denial to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the arguments that get Board denials set aside.
From our issue-level parse of 1,929,585 public Board decisions (dated 1992-03-30 to 2026-07-31; archive years 1992–2025 complete; 2026 partial, added as the Board publishes; Board data build 2026-10-07):
Open these issues in the Board decision finder (filter by judge, years, outcome or evidence; links to each decision on va.gov). Full Board-level tables: outcome rates by condition · judge statistics.
“Second, the Board failed to apply to the appellant's case the statutes, regulations, and caselaw governing severance of service connection.”
“Accordingly, the Court concludes that the Board provided an inadequate statement of reasons or bases for concluding that VA had satisfied its duty to assist.”
“In this case, the Board did not discuss the applicability of the implicit denial doctrine and therefore did not discuss any of the factors outlined in this decision.”
“Nonetheless, the Board failed to consider the lay evidence of record regarding the appellant's observable PTSD symptoms.”
Each passage is the Court's own sentence from the cited published decision, with the veteran's name removed; the reasoning label is a keyword tag for the decision as a whole. Read the full decision at the Court's opinions page or by docket number at CourtListener. A holding that fit one record does not guarantee it fits another.
Upload your decision letter — the free analyzer maps its reasoning against these patterns and computes your exact deadlines, including CAVC's 120 days.
Analyze my denial free →VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid