The two-step reality of a knee appeal: what the Board does with these issues, and — when veterans appeal a denial to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the arguments that get Board denials set aside.
From our issue-level parse of 1,929,585 public Board decisions (dated 1992-03-30 to 2026-07-31; archive years 1992–2025 complete; 2026 partial, added as the Board publishes; Board data build 2026-10-07):
Open these issues in the Board decision finder (filter by judge, years, outcome or evidence; links to each decision on va.gov). Full Board-level tables: outcome rates by condition · judge statistics.
“As explained above, the Court holds that the Board erred in its determination that appellant's CUE allegation must be denied as a matter of law.”
“Additionally, the Board did not address the potentially favorable evidence of functional loss identified by the appellant.”
“Here, the Board failed to provide the foundation for relying on the medical records' silence on side effects.”
“Yet, the 2003 Board failed to explain why it could proceed to render a decision on the claim when, based on basically the same evidence, the 2001 Board determined that a remand for a medical nexus opinion was necessary.”
Each passage is the Court's own sentence from the cited published decision, with the veteran's name removed; the reasoning label is a keyword tag for the decision as a whole. Read the full decision at the Court's opinions page or by docket number at CourtListener. A holding that fit one record does not guarantee it fits another.
Upload your decision letter — the free analyzer maps its reasoning against these patterns and computes your exact deadlines, including CAVC's 120 days.
Analyze my denial free →VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid