BVA Decisions on Prostate

16 real veterans-appeals decisions on VA disability claims involving prostate — Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions and U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decisions, each labeled with its court. Each links to the full decision, reasoning, and citations.

Sponsored

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

Rating 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Married Children 01234

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)

Rating	Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%	$180.42
20%	$356.66
30%	$552.47
40%	$795.84
50%	$1,132.90
60%	$1,435.02
70%	$1,808.45
80%	$2,102.15
90%	$2,362.30
100%	$3,938.58

See your full claim picture — free

• CAVCCase 91-619 — Vacated 1991-04-10
  The issue is whether certain material findings of fact by the BVA in its October l0, l989, decision should be held unlawful and set aside because they are "clearly erroneous" under...
• CAVCCase 06-1464 — Vacated / Remanded 2006-02-01
  The appellant had submitted new and material evidence sufficient to reopen a claim for service connection for a lower back disability; (2) denied that claim on the merits; (3) deni...
• CAVCCase 94-0927 — Affirmed / Reversed 1992-02-21
  As was the case in Ramey, the BVA decision here was issued prior to the Combee opinion, and the BVA failed to address the question of direct service connection....
• CAVCCase 21-3379 — Affirmed / Vacated / Remanded 2021-03-17
  Following the examination,VA sought an additional medical opinion,explaining that the prior examiner also noted a diagnosis of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH),a condition that i...
• CAVCCase 12-0393 — Vacated / Remanded 2011-10-14
  In December 1981,the Board denied the appellant entitlement to disability benefits for a left knee disability....
• CAVCCase 22-4105 — Vacated / Remanded 2021-07-30
  In the March 2022 decision here on appeal,the Board found that the October 2021 decision provided an incomplete discussion of the April 2021 VA medical opinion and failed to discus...
• CAVCCase 24-2039 — Unknown 2025-05-07
  The Secretary concedes the Board erred in denying a TDIU....
• CAVCCase 24-0638 — Vacated / Remanded 2025-03-24
  The appellant argues that the Board erred by (1)failing to address favorable evidence and to lay a proper foundation for denying service connection for tinnitus;(2)failing to discu...
• CAVCCase 21-0372 — Vacated / Remanded 2020-10-07
  Also,in denying a higher rating for coronary artery disease,the Board noted that the appellant's reporting of his symptoms is credible....
• CAVCCase 24-6361 — Dismissed 2026-01-06
  The Board noted that the RO had not afforded the veteran a medical examination to determine whether his bilateral hand osteoarthritis was related to service,but the Board found no ...
• CAVCCase 13-1865 — Affirmed / Vacated / Remanded 2013-05-22
  In the second decision on appeal (Decision 2),the Board denied the appellant....
• CAVCCase 18-4075 — Vacated / Remanded 2020-11-30
  Additionally,the Board found that a December 1999 rating decision denying service connection for right thigh hematoma residuals was final;found that the appellant submitted new and...
• CAVCCase 08-2682 — Remanded / Affirmed / Vacated 2008-05-16
  In the decision here on appeal,the Board denied entitlement to service connection for PTSD, bilateral flat feet,a left ankle condition,right ear hearing loss,and tinnitus because i...
• Fed. Cir.Case 14-2811 — Denied 2020-08-12
  The appellant’s case, the Board concluded that two ser- vice department records, which were received in 2006 and 2007, were not “relevant” under the regulation because they did not...
• CAVCCase 14-0396 — Affirmed 2013-12-20
  He contends that the Board erred in finding that he was not entitled to a presumption of service connection under 38 U....
• CAVCCase 20-4401 — Reversed / Remanded / Vacated 2020-05-21
  7 The Secretary concedes that the Board failed to adequately support its decision because it did not reconcile conflicting evidence about whether appellant suffered additional disa...