BVA Case 21-0372: Back

Also,in denying a higher rating for coronary artery disease,the Board noted that the appellant's reporting of his symptoms is credible.

On October 7,2020, the Board denied entitlement to TDIU for the period prior to January 12,2017.

ANALYSIS The appellant maintains that the Board erred in discounting the 2017 vocational assessment and in finding that he is capable of sedentary employment.

The Board then noted that the vocational expert relied on specific evidence to support his conclusion, but the Board found that the relied-on evidence as well as other evidence of record was inconsistent with the vocational expert's opinion.

Specifically,the Board noted that the vocational expert referenced the appellant's statements recorded in the January 2010 VA examination report � that he had fatigue,shortness of breath,and problems with balance and stumbling after walking 100 to 200 yards;that the symptoms occurred almost daily;and that they would last until he was able to rest for 1 to 2 hours.

The Board concluded, however,that the expert failed to discuss the 2011 VA examiner's opinion that the appellant's cardiac condition had mild effects on his usual occupation and daily activities,that the appellant had achieved maximal exercise tolerance testing, and that the appellant's reported symptoms were subjective factors.

Moreover,the Board noted that a December 2010 VA examiner had opined that there was no impact or mild impact on the appellant's ability to work,and that the VA examiners had conducted 7 in-person examinations,whereas the vocational expert had conducted a telephone interview.

Additionally,the Board noted that,although the vocational expert had referenced the February 2011 DBQ reflecting that the appellant tires easily,has no reserve energy,and has difficulty simply completing his activities of daily living,that 2011 physician did not conclude that the [appellant]was unable to maintain any type of gainful employment.