BVA Case 24-2039: Ptsd

Real Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · May 7,2025 · GREENBERG, Judge

Outcome
Unknown
Decision Date
May 7,2025
Judge
GREENBERG, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PtsdDepressionAnxietyPsychiatricBackHipDiabetesTdiuErectileProstate

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionEffective DateTdiuIncreased RatingPtsd

Why It Was Decided This Way

The Secretary concedes the Board erred in denying a TDIU.

at 5-15,the Board found that the appellant's PTSD with depressive disorder was manifested by occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity from May 29,2018,and before that date,the disorder was manifested by occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks.

The Board found that the medical records showed that from May 29,2018,the appellant was alert and oriented,with good grooming 6 Case:24-2039 Page: 7 of 14 Filed:05/07/2025 and hygiene,intact and organized thoughts,and normal speech, and without suicidal or homicidal ideations,delusions,paranoia,or psychotic symptoms.

The Board conceded that the appellant reported occurrences of irritation,frustration,isolation (outside of his family and girlfriend),and nightmares, but the Board found that the appellant reported increased mental health benefits from interacting with his granddaughters.

The Board also acknowledged that the appellant was more depressed after his prostate surgery,but the Board found that his walking routine and search for meaningful activities helped decrease the depression.

The Board found that the appellant reported that he was pursuing multiple hobbies.

The Board noted that the June 2018 examiner noted moderate PTSD symptoms,including nightmares, intrusive thoughts of combat,irritability,hypervigilance, depressed mood,anxiety, chronic sleep impairment, difficulty establishing and maintaining relationships,and suicidal ideation, causing occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity.

The Board determined that the appellant's PTSD with depressive disorder manifested in symptoms more closely approximating a 50%rating;though the Board acknowledged the appellant's history of suicidal thoughts, the Board found that the records contain a low frequency and low level of severity of suicidal ideations.

Authorities Cited

Andrews v. McBowling v. PrincipiCantrell v. ShulkinCarroll v. McClaudio v. ShinsekiConroy v. AniskoffEvans v. WestFletcher v. DerwinskiFrankel v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiGolden v. ShulkinHanson v. BrownHedgepeth v. WilkieHenderson v. ShinsekiIn Ray v. WilkieLisio v. ShinsekiMarbury v. MadisonMauerhan v. PrincipiRusso v. BrownSee Allday v. BrownSee Bankhead v. ShulkinSee Caluza v. BrownSee Dunn v. WestSee Kutscherousky v. WestSee Tucker v. WestSee Yick Wo v. HopkinsSwain v. McVan Hoose v. BrownWarren v. McWithers v. Wilkie

Denial Type

Credibility|Inadequate Exam

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →