CAVC Case 91-504: Back
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · October 5, 1994 · NEBEKER, Chief Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
BackCervicalRespiratory
Why It Was Decided This Way
In decisions dated September and December 1974, the RO denied entitlement to non-service-connected pension; those decisions did not address the issue of service connection.
In an August 1978 decision, the Board found that chronic obstructive lung disease had not been shown to be present until many years after service and denied service connection.
In a January 1991 decision, the Board denied entitlement to service connection for COPD.
In February 1993, the RO again denied service connection, concluding that "the medical information that we received in reply to the [Court's] remand of your claim does not constitute new and material evidence".
In an April 1993 written presentation to the BVA, the veteran's representative argued that the preponderance of the evidence was in the veteran's favor and urged the Board to award service connection.
In the July 19, 1993, decision here on appeal, the Board determined that the claim was well grounded and that new and material evidence, in the form of private physician statements opining that the veteran's COPD had begun in service, had been presented.
The Board noted that, although the RO had determined that new and material evidence had not been presented, "we do not believe the veteran has been prejudiced in any way in the presentation of his claim by this determination.
The Board stated as follows: It is clear from the veteran's substantive appeal that he disagrees with the RO's determination that the additional evidence was not new and material, but he has also presented contentions and arguments regarding the merits of his claim.
Authorities Cited
Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)
Denial Type
Credibility|Not New Material|Preponderance Against
Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →