BVA Case 23029996: Ptsd

Real Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · May 23, 2023 · Vito A. Clementi

Outcome
Remanded
Decision Date
May 23, 2023
Judge
Vito A. Clementi
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PtsdPsychiatricBackCervicalKneeHearing_LossTinnitusShoulderHeadacheSkin

Why It Was Decided This Way

The additional documentation submitted since the September 2009 rating decision is new and material and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the Veteran's claim of service connection for joint pain.

The additional documentation submitted since the September 2009 rating decision is new and material and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the Veteran's claim of service connection for muscle pain.

The additional documentation submitted since the September 2009 rating decision is new and material and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the Veteran's claim of service connection for a skin rash.

The additional documentation submitted since the September 2009 rating decision is new and material and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the Veteran's claim of service connection for chronic fatigue.

The additional documentation submitted since the September 2009 rating decision is new and material and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the Veteran's claim of service connection for a sinus disorder and headaches.

The additional documentation submitted since the February 2003 rating decision is new and material and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the Veteran's claim of service connection for tinnitus.

The December 2010 claim to reopen service connection was denied because no new and material evidence was received within one year of the March 2011 letter informing him that he needed to submit such evidence.

New and material evidence sufficient to reopen the Veteran's claim of service connection for joint pain has been presented.

Authorities Cited

Barnett v. BrownBell v. DerwinskiCharles v. PrincipiEsteban v. BrownEvans v. BrownFerenc v. NicholsonJackson v. PrincipiJandreau v. NicholsonJoyner v. McJustus v. PrincipiRice v. ShinsekiSee Allen v. BrownSee Fountain v. McSee Gutierrez v. PrincipiSee Hodge v. WestShade v. ShinsekiShedden v. PrincipiWalker v. Shinseki

Denial Type

Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material|Cue

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →