CAVC Case 90-58: Back

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · April 10, 1991 · NEBEKER, Chief Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Vacated
Decision Date
April 10, 1991
Judge
NEBEKER, Chief Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

BackSkinProstate

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

BackSkinProstate

Why It Was Decided This Way

The issue is whether certain material findings of fact by the BVA in its October l0, l989, decision should be held unlawful and set aside because they are "clearly erroneous" under 38 U.

In February 1988, the veteran reopened his claim at the RO on the basis of his submission of "new and material evidence".

§ 3008 (1988) provides: If new and material evidence is presented or secured with respect to a claim which has been disallowed, the [Secretary] shall reopen the claim and review the former disposition of the claim.

Under section 3008, when a claimant seeks a reopening of his or her claim by submitting what is asserted to be "new and material" evidence, a "two-step analysis" must be performed: if the 4 evidence is determined by the regional office or the BVA to be "new and material", the claim is to be reopened; then a review is made to determine whether the former disposition of the claim should be altered.

As to the first step, the parties agree that new and material evidence was submitted by the claimant.

At oral argument, counsel for the Secretary acknowledged that the evidence submitted was considered by the BVA to be new and material.

In its decision, the BVA did seem to concede that new and material evidence had been submitted.

8, 1991), the question of whether newly submitted evidence is "new and material" under section 3008 is a question of law.

Authorities Cited

Accord Smith v. DerwinskiAnderson v. CityBigelow v. VirginiaColvin v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiManio v. DerwinskiNixon v. Warner CommunicationsSkinner v. Derwinski

Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)

38 CFR 19.194 (l990)38 CFR 3.156(c)38 CFR 3.303(b) (l990)38 USC 3007(b) (l988)38 USC 300838 USC 3008 (1988)38 USC 3008 (l988)38 USC 4004(a) (1988)38 USC 4004(b)38 USC 4004(b) (1988)38 USC 4004(b) (l988)38 USC 4004(d)(1)38 USC 4004(d)(1) (1988)38 USC 4004(d)(l)38 USC 4052 (l988)38 USC 4061 (a)(3)38 USC 4061(a)(4)38 USC 4061(a)(4) (1988)38 USC 4067(d) (1988)

Denial Type

Credibility|Not New Material

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.