BVA Case 95-454: Back
BVAReal Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · · MICHEL, Chief Judge
Conditions Claimed
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
BackShoulderHipEye
Why It Was Decided This Way
Furthermore, though not explicitly mentioned in Cruz, the standards set forth in Cruz are consistent with the Board’s own regulation that places the burden on the claimant to establish jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence.
Then, at that hearing, the claimant has the burden of establishing the Board’s jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence.
56, which requires an employee to prove the Board’s jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence, is entitled to deference and is therefore lawful.
On July 23, 2004, the Board determined that “the administrative judge made no 04-3442 6 error in law or regulation that affects the outcome” and denied the petition.
56, which states that “[t]he appellant has the burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence, with respect to .
if the employee proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that [his or her action] was involuntary and thus tantamount to [a forced enumerated adverse action].
Garcia alleges that the administrative judge erred by requiring her to prove the Board’s jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence.
If at the hearing the claimant establishes the Board’s jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence, then jurisdiction attaches to the case and the Board has the power to decide the merits of the claim.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Preponderance Against
Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →