CAVC Case 95-444: Psychiatric

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · March 21, 1997 · KRAMER

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Denied
Decision Date
March 21, 1997
Judge
KRAMER
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PsychiatricBackCervicalKneeHipSkinHeartGITDIUEye

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

PsychiatricBackCervicalKneeHipSkinHeartGI

Why It Was Decided This Way

A well-grounded service-connection claim generally requires medical evidence of a current disability; medical or, in certain circumstances, lay evidence of in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury; and medical evidence of a nexus between an in-service injury or disease and a current disability.

For the purpose of determining whether a claim is well grounded, the credibility of the evidence is presumed.

As noted earlier, a well-grounded service-connection claim generally requires, inter alia, competent evidence of in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury, and medical evidence of a nexus between an in-service injury or disease (or the aggravation thereof) and a current disability (if one is shown by the evidence).

As to the in-service-incurrence and medical-nexus prongs of the well-grounded-claim requirement, no direct evidence is required as to a soft-tissue-sarcoma claim in the case of a Vietnam veteran.

309(e), fulfills the requirements for evidence of both service incurrence and medical nexus.

§ 1154(b) related only to the question of service incurrence, "that is, what happened then -- not the questions of either current disability or nexus to service, as to both of which competent medical evidence is generally required.

309(e), would always carry with it the presumption of nexus to service as well.

12 That leaves as the only remaining question as to well groundedness whether the veteran has submitted sufficient evidence to make out a plausible showing of present soft-tissue sarcoma, given the presumption of credibility that attaches to that evidence for this threshold purpose, see Robinette, supra, and thus to well ground his claim for service connection for soft-tissue sarcoma under 38 U.

Authorities Cited

Barnett v. BrownCay v. BrownCosman v. PrincipiDegmetich v. BrownEdenfield v. BrownFeres v. United StatesFevre v. SecretaryFrankel v. DerwinskiGoss v. BrownGrottveit v. BrownHeuer v. BrownMurphy v. DerwinskiNehmer v. United States VeteransRabideau v. DerwinskiRogozinski v. DerwinskiSee Brammer v. DerwinskiSee Caluza v. BrownSee Combee v. BrownSee Grivois v. BrownSee Libertine v. BrownSee Meyer v. BrownSee Robinette v. BrownSolomon v. BrownWood v. Derwinski

Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)

38 CFR 3.303(a)38 CFR 3.307(a)38 CFR 3.307(a)(6)38 CFR 3.307(a)(6)(ii) (1996)38 CFR 3.309(e)38 CFR 3.311a38 CFR 4.10438 CFR 4.11638 CFR 4.7338 USC 111038 USC 1112(a)38 USC 111638 USC 1116(a)(1)38 USC 1116(a)(i)38 USC 1154(b)38 USC 5107(a)38 USC 510838 USC 7252(b)38 USC 7261(a)(1)38 USC 7261(b)

Denial Type

Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material|Duty To Assist

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.