CAVC Case 95-199: Anxiety

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 1946-05-10 · STEINBERG, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Unknown
Decision Date
1946-05-10
Judge
STEINBERG, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

AnxietyPsychiatricDiabetesTDIUEye

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionReopen

Why It Was Decided This Way

STEINBERG, Judge : The pro se appellant, the veteran appeals a September 1, 1992, Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board or BVA) decision that determined that new and material evidence had not been presented to reopen previously and finally disallowed claims for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) service connection for residuals of scarlet fever and for a psychiatric disorder.

In a November 28, 1986, BVA decision, the Board denied the hemorrhoid-related temporary-total-rating and rating- increase claims.

An October 15, 1990, RO decision determined that no new and material evidence had been presented to reopen previously and finally disallowed claims for a nervous disorder and residuals of scarlet fever.

On September 16, 1991, the hearing officer determined that no new and material evidence had been presented to reopen the veteran's claims for service connection for a nervous disorder as secondary to treatment in service and residuals of scarlet fever.

In the September 1, 1992, BVA decision here on appeal, the Board determined that new and material evidence had not been presented to reopen previously and finally disallowed claims for service connection for residuals of scarlet fever and a psychiatric disorder.

The Secretary must reopen a previously and finally disallowed claim when new and material evidence is presented or secured.

The first step involves a determination as to whether the evidence presented or secured since the last final disallowance of the claim is new and material.

the Board has determined that newly presented evidence is cumulative of previously considered evidence and thus is not 'new' for purposes of reopening a claim, that should end the Board's analysis of whether the evidence is 'new and material'.

Authorities Cited

Allen v. BrownCaluza v. BrownEddy v. BrownEdenfield v. BrownElkins v. WestEpps v. GoberEpps v. WestEspiritu v. DerwinskiFrankel v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiGonzalez v. WestGrottveit v. BrownHeuer v. BrownHodge v. WestHorowitz v. BrownLibertine v. BrownMurphy v. DerwinskiReiber v. BrownRobinette v. BrownSee Buckley v. WestSee Ledford v. WestSee Stadin v. BrownWinters v. West

Denial Type

Non Denial Outcome

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid