CAVC Case 92-622: Depression
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · March 6, 1995 · NEBEKER, Chief Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
DepressionBackCervicalHearing LossShoulderHipAnkleHeadacheHeartDiabetes
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
DepressionBackCervicalHearing LossShoulderHipAnkleHeadache
Why It Was Decided This Way
The appellant has filed a brief requesting that the Court vacate the Board's decision denying his claims for back condition and arthritis, reverse the Board's finding that the evidence submitted to support his claim was not new and material, and reverse the Board's decision that the issue of the residuals of the right-ankle fracture was not properly before the Board for review.
In January 1990, the RO denied reopening of those claims, concluding that "[t]he evidence is new and material but does not establish a new factual basis for a grant of S[ervice] C[onnection]".
A January 1991 VA letter informed the veteran that his claims had been denied because "the evidence is new and material but does not provide a new factual basis for service connection for back condition, [and] arthritis".
In the January 9, 1992, BVA decision here on appeal, the Board found that, as to the claim of entitlement to service connection for the veteran's right ankle, the matter was not properly before it for appellate review, and "referred [that matter] to the attention of the [RO] for further consideration".
As to the back and arthritis service-connection claims, the Board found that no new and material evidence to reopen those claims had been presented or secured since the time of the March 1988 final RO decision and did not reopen the claims.
§ 5108, the Secretary must reopen a previously and finally disallowed claim when "new and material evidence" is presented or secured with respect to that claim.
The Board must first determine whether the evidence presented or secured since the prior final disallowance of the claim is "new and material" when viewed in the context of all the evidence.
A Board determination as to whether evidence is "new and material" is a question of law subject to de novo review in this Court under 38 U.
Authorities Cited
Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)
Denial Type
Credibility|Not New Material
Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →