CAVC Case 92-144: PTSD
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · October 7, 1993 · FARLEY
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
PTSDDepressionPsychiatricBackHipEye
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
PTSDDepressionPsychiatricBackHipEye
Why It Was Decided This Way
MANKIN, Judge: Joe Elkins appeals the October 16, 1991, Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which determined that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen his claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder.
In February 1968, the Board denied service connection for a psychiatric condition, stating that schizophrenia was not diagnosed until two years after service.
The Board noted that appellant was treated for globus hystericus in May 1956.
On October 16, 1991, the Board found that new and material evidence had not been presented to reopen appellant's claim for service connection.
§ 5108 (West 1991), a previously disallowed claim may be reopened only when "new and material" evidence is presented.
Whether evidence submitted to reopen a previously and finally disallowed claim is new and material is a question of law which the Court reviews de novo.
The Board determined that these letters were new, but not material.
Appellant's factual contentions have been considered previously by the RO and BVA, and they cannot be accepted as "new and material" evidence simply because they now form the basis of a medical opinion.
Authorities Cited
Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material
Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →