CAVC Case 91-386: PTSD

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · December 2, 1993 · NEBEKER, Chief Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Vacated / Remanded
Decision Date
December 2, 1993
Judge
NEBEKER, Chief Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PTSDAnxietyPsychiatricBackCervicalHipHeartEye

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

PTSDAnxietyPsychiatricBackCervicalHipHeartEye

Why It Was Decided This Way

In a decision dated October 24, 1990, the Board denied service connection for the cause of the veteran's death, stating that symptoms characteristic of PTSD were not noted in the clinical record, and that the facts did not warrant an independent medical expert evaluation or Chief Medical Director opinion in the case.

Factual findings of the BVA will not be overturned by this Court unless they fail to meet the "clearly erroneous" standard of review.

The Board in this case did not address evidence of possible stressors in service or provide reasons or bases for its conclusion that the veteran did not experience stressors while in the service or for its apparent determination that the veteran's evidence was inadequate evidence of stressors.

Here, the BVA decision failed to include an analysis of the March 27, 1989, hearing testimony, including a discussion of the credibility and the probative value of the testimony of the veteran's father, and of appellant regarding the veteran's behavior after returning from Vietnam.

The VA's statutory "duty to assist" the veteran under 38 U.

This case also held that the BVA failed in its duty to assist the veteran's widow in developing the facts pertinent to her claim.

In defining what constitutes a "contributory cause of death," VA regulations provide: Contributory cause of death is inherently one not related to the principal cause.

The Board erred by employing its own unsubstantiated medical opinion to answer whether alcohol dependence resulting from PTSD may have been the "primary or contributory" cause of the veteran's death.

Authorities Cited

Browder v. BrownBudnik v. DerwinskiCosman v. PrincipiGilbert v. DerwinskiHare v. DerwinskiHarrison v. PrincipiHatlestad v. DerwinskiHayes v. BrownIn Colvin v. DerwinskiIn Williams v. BrownLovelace v. DerwinskiMeeks v. BrownMoore v. DerwinskiMurphy v. DerwinskiPruitt v. DerwinskiQuarles v. DerwinskiSee Shoemaker v. DerwinskiSheets v. DerwinskiSimon v. DerwinskiStegman v. DerwinskiSuttmann v. BrownTobin v. Derwinski

Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)

38 CFR 3.1138 CFR 3.304(d)38 CFR 3.304(d) (1993)38 CFR 3.312(a) (1993)38 CFR 3.312(b) (1993)38 CFR 3.312(c)(1) (1993)38 USC 1154(b)38 USC 5107(a)38 USC 5107(b)38 USC 7104(d)(1)38 USC 7252(a)

Denial Type

Credibility|Duty To Assist

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.