CAVC Case 90-196: Knee

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · March 8, 1991 · KRAMER

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Reversed
Decision Date
March 8, 1991
Judge
KRAMER
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

KneeEye

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

KneeEye

Why It Was Decided This Way

HOLDAWAY, Associate Judge: This case concerns an appeal of a Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) decision that the veteran had not submitted evidence that was both new and material with his request to reopen his claim that he had incurred multiple sclerosis during service.

We hold that the evidence submitted was new and material and provides a basis for reopening the claim to consider the new evidence in the context of the other evidence in order to review the former disposition.

The law provides that when new and material evidence is presented or secured with respect to a claim which has been disallowed, "the [Secretary of Veterans Affairs] shall reopen the claim and review the former disposition.

First, the BVA must determine whether the evidence is 'new and material'.

2 Second, if the BVA determines that the claimant has produced new and material evidence, the case is reopened and the BVA must evaluate the merits of the veteran's claim in light of all the evidence, both new and old.

The Board determined that no acceptable medical or lay evidence showed the characteristic manifestations of multiple sclerosis in the veteran during his 3 active duty or within the seven-year presumptive period.

On August 11, 1988, the veteran submitted a request to reopen his claim on the basis of new and material evidence and attached a letter written by Dr.

When a statute uses a broad term such as [new and material], it is necessary that the administrative body and the court, as joint instrumentalities of government, fill in the factors which govern the proper determination of the question presented.

Authorities Cited

Chaney v. SchweikerGilbert v. DerwinskiManio v. DerwinskiMurphy v. DerwinskiSee Chisholm v. SecretaryWilliams v. Sullivan

Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)

38 CFR 19.194 (1990)38 CFR 3.156(a)38 USC 3007(b)(1988)38 USC 3008 (1988)38 USC 310 (1988)38 USC 312(a)(4) (1988)38 USC 313 (1988)38 USC 4009 (1988)38 USC 4061 (1988)38 USC 4067(d) (1988)

Denial Type

Credibility|Not New Material

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.