BVA Case 24-6435: Ptsd

Real Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · January 14,2026 · MEREDITH, Judge

Outcome
Reversed / Remanded / Vacated / Affirmed
Decision Date
January 14,2026
Judge
MEREDITH, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PtsdDepressionPsychiatricBackCervicalKneeHearing_LossTinnitusSleep_ApneaShoulder

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionKnee ConditionIncreased RatingHearing LossPtsdSleep ApneaHip Condition

Why It Was Decided This Way

The shoulder examiner concluded that the appellant's left shoulder condition was less likely than not related to service.

Although the fall down stairs with bilateral shoulder injury is acknowledge[d],a nexus for service connection cannot be made at this time due to the missing elements of origin and chronicity of the current claimed conditio[]n.

A disability which began in service or was caused by some event in service must be considered chronic before a nexus for service connection can be established.

Therefore, a nexus for service connection for the shoulder condition cannot be made.

Specifically,he contends that the Board did not address the June 2012 private audiogram,which he contends shows hearing loss for VA purposes in the right ear.

In addition,he avers that, because he submitted the private audiogram with his initial application, the issue of the relevance of this document was reasonably and explicitly raised[,]and the Board erred by not specifically addressing it.

Board Decision As an initial matter,the Board noted that the appeal stemmed from September,November, and December 2020 RO decisions.

The Board found,however,that the appellant did not have a left or right ear hearing loss disability for VA purposes.

Authorities Cited

Allday v. BrownAries v. PeakeBarr v. NicholsonBerger v. BrownBest v. PrincipiBond v. DerwinskiClain v. NicholsonCorreia v. McDavidson v. ShinsekiDegmetich v. BrownDofflemyer v. DerwinskiEvans v. ShinsekiFaust v. WestFletcher v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiHampton v. GoberHilkert v. WestJanssen v. PrincipiMedrano v. ShinsekiMoore v. ShinsekiOwens v. BrownRobinson v. PeakeRobinson v. ShinsekiRomanowsky v. ShinsekiSchafrath v. DerwinskiSee Breeden v. PrincipiSee Brown v. BrownSee Frankel v. DerwinskiSee Kahana v. ShinsekiSee Locklear v. Nicholson

Denial Type

Credibility|No Nexus|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →