CAVC Case 24-4772: Depression
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2025-05-23 · MEREDITH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
DepressionBackKneeHearing LossTinnitusHipAnkleTDIU
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionKnee ConditionIncreased RatingHearing LossHip Condition
Why It Was Decided This Way
at 7,and that [t]he evidence of record is littered with favorable evidence that the Board should fully and sympathetically develop,giving all benefit of the doubt to the [appellant], id.
at 12;and (3) did not consider,analyze[,]or provide any comments regarding many relative facts or testimony, id.
And to the extent that the appellant argues that the Board failed to consider whether he ingested contaminated food and water, the Secretary asserts that the appellant has not previously raised this theory to the Agency or pointed to any evidence reasonably raising this possibility.
Law Establishing that a disability is service connected for purposes of entitlement to VA disability compensation generally requires medical or,in certain circumstances,lay evidence of (1)a current disability,(2)incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury in service,and (3)a nexus between the claimed in-service injury or disease and the current disability.
It is the Board's responsibility,as factfinder, to determine the credibility and weight to be given to the evidence.
429,433 (1995)(holding that the Board is responsible for assessing the credibility and weight of evidence and that the Court may overturn the Board's decision only if it is clearly erroneous).
The Board must analyze the credibility and probative value of the material evidence,account for the evidence that it finds to be persuasive or unpersuasive,and provide the reasons for its rejection of any material evidence favorable to the claimant.
Additionally,the general standard of proof in veterans benefits cases � the benefit of the doubt � provides that, [w]hen there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding any issue material to the determination of a matter,the Secretary shall give the benefit of the doubt to the claimant.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Preponderance Against
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →