BVA Case 24-4772: Depression

at 7,and that [t]he evidence of record is littered with favorable evidence that the Board should fully and sympathetically develop,giving all benefit of the doubt to the [appellant], id.

at 12;and (3) did not consider,analyze[,]or provide any comments regarding many relative facts or testimony, id.

And to the extent that the appellant argues that the Board failed to consider whether he ingested contaminated food and water, the Secretary asserts that the appellant has not previously raised this theory to the Agency or pointed to any evidence reasonably raising this possibility.

Law Establishing that a disability is service connected for purposes of entitlement to VA disability compensation generally requires medical or,in certain circumstances,lay evidence of (1)a current disability,(2)incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury in service,and (3)a nexus between the claimed in-service injury or disease and the current disability.

It is the Board's responsibility,as factfinder, to determine the credibility and weight to be given to the evidence.

429,433 (1995)(holding that the Board is responsible for assessing the credibility and weight of evidence and that the Court may overturn the Board's decision only if it is clearly erroneous).

The Board must analyze the credibility and probative value of the material evidence,account for the evidence that it finds to be persuasive or unpersuasive,and provide the reasons for its rejection of any material evidence favorable to the claimant.

Additionally,the general standard of proof in veterans benefits cases � the benefit of the doubt � provides that, [w]hen there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding any issue material to the determination of a matter,the Secretary shall give the benefit of the doubt to the claimant.