CAVC Case 24-4510: Back

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2025-09-09 · PIETSCH, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Unknown
Decision Date
2025-09-09
Judge
PIETSCH, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

BackCervicalShoulderTDIUArthritisRadiculopathy

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

SMCBack ConditionService ConnectionReopen

Why It Was Decided This Way

PIETSCH, Judge : the appellant ,through counsel,appeals an April 4, 2024,Board of Veterans'Appeals (Board)decision that (1) denied service connection for upper extremity neurological disability;and (2)found no new and material evidence to reopen claims for service connectionfor a left shoulder disability,lumbar spine disorder,andneuropathyof the lower extremities.

1 The Board favorably found that new and material evidencehad been submitted to reopen a claim for service connection for a right shoulder disability.

For the reasons that follow,the Court will vacate the part of the Board's decision that denied service connection for upper extremity neurological disability and found no new and material evidence to reopen claims for service connection for a left shoulder disability,lumbar spine disorder,and neuropathy of the lower extremities,and the Court will remand the matters for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

In a September 2017 rating decision,the RO found no new and material evidence to reopen a claim for service connection for a back condition.

In an October 2018 rating decision,the RO denied service connection for upper extremity neurological disability and found no new and material evidence to reopen service- connection claims for bilateral lower extremity neuropathy and bilateral shoulder disabilities.

The RO continued to deny service connection for a lumbar spine disorder,bilateral lower extremity neuropathy,bilateral upper extremity neurological disability, and bilateral shoulder disorders,all on the basis that the conditions were not related to military service.

The RO did not mention whether new and material evidence hadbeenreceived to reopen service-connection claims for a left shoulder disability, lumbar spine disorder,or bilateral lower extremity neuropathy.

April 2024 Board Decision In the April 2024 decision on appeal, the Board noted that all issues on appeal had been remanded in May 2023 for the RO to consider evidence in the first instance.

Authorities Cited

Fletcher v. DerwinskiFrankel v. DerwinskiHoward v. GoberIn Maggitt v. WestJackson v. PrincipiKirkpatrick v. NicholsonKutscherousky v. WestMedrano v. ShinsekiRobinson v. PeakeRobinson v. ShinsekiSee Breeden v. PrincipiSee Harris v. DerwinskiSee Hensley v. WestSee Jackson v. PrincipiSee Kay v. PrincipiSee Medrano v. NicholsonSee Pederson v. McSee Tucker v. WestShinseki v. SandersStegall v. WestTadlock v. Mc

Denial Type

Non Denial Outcome

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid