CAVC Case 24-2902: PTSD

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2025-07-21 · GREENBERG

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Vacated / Remanded
Decision Date
2025-07-21
Judge
GREENBERG
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PTSDDepressionAnxietyPsychiatricBackCervicalKneeShoulderAnkleHeadache

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

SMCBack ConditionService ConnectionEffective DateReopenIncreased RatingPTSD

Why It Was Decided This Way

In June 2016,the Board denied entitlement to a rating in excess of 30% for MS;granted a 30%rating for MS from March 9,2015; and granted entitlement to a 10% rating for left upper extremity disability from August 7,2013.

The RO declined to reopen the claim for a left shoulder condition because new and material evidence was not submitted.

In March 2022,the Board denied entitlement to an effective date earlier than September 21,2007,for service connection for left upper extremity disability associated with MS.

Nurse Kim opined that the in- service left shoulder condition was acute and a nexus was not established to service,because there was no evidence of chronicity of care and only subjective symptoms were noted.

The Board noted the appellant's argument that she was entitled to a 30% rating under DC 8018 and the recent Court decision in Duran v.

The Board found that the appellant did not have a current left shoulder diagnosis separate from the service- connected left upper extremity disability.

The Board concluded that records between 2014 and 2023 did not include evidence of left shoulder imaging showing chronic pathology involving the articulating joint,nor did they show a clear/conclusive/definitive separate left shoulder diagnosis.

The Board found that the June 2022 medical opinion did not include a left shoulder diagnosis, most likely due to the lack of evidence of abnormalities on testing .

Authorities Cited

Andrews v. McBanschbach v. McConroy v. AniskoffCray v. WilkieDuran v. McEvans v. ShinsekiFletcher v. DerwinskiFrankel v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiHenderson v. ShinsekiLendenmann v. PrincipiMarbury v. MadisonRobinson v. ShinsekiSchafrath v. DerwinskiSee Caluza v. BrownSee Dunn v. WestSee Kutscherousky v. WestSee Pederson v. McSee Robinson v. PeakeSimmons v. WilkieSmith v. NicholsonWebb v. Mc

Denial Type

No Nexus|Not New Material|Inadequate Exam

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid