CAVC Case 23-6946: Back
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2025-09-24 · SCHOELEN
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
BackCervicalShoulderHeadacheTBIHeartTDIUArthritisRadiculopathy
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionEffective DateReopenTDIUIncreased Rating
Why It Was Decided This Way
The RO found that the evidence did not show that the appellant had incurred a cervical spine disability during his in-service MVA and that any present disability was not related to service.
In a November 1997 rating decision,the RO found that the October 1997 buddy statement was not new and material evidence adequate to reopen the claim for service connection for residuals of head injury.
The RO found that x-rays showing degenerative joint disease, a nerve study consultation indicating the appellant's history of neck and back pain,and VA treatment records showing chronic neck and back pain with limited motion were not new and material evidence.
The RO found that VA medical records were not new and material evidence sufficient to reopen a finally adjudicated claim.
In November 2021,the Board found that the August 2015 rating decision had not been appealed and became final,with no further action until the March 2020 claim.
At briefing,the Secretary conceded that the Board failed to determine whether the October 1997 buddy statement was new and material evidence and whether the May 2002, September 2007,and August 2015 rating decisions considered the buddy statement within the context of 3.
3 Case:23-6946 Page: 4 of 10 Filed:09/24/2025 In October 2023,the Board denied an effective date before March 22,2020,for service connection for a neck injury.
First,the Board unequivocally found that the October 1997 buddy statement was new and material evidence that VA had received within 1 year of the March 1997 decision,so that decision did not become final.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Not New Material
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →