CAVC Case 23-6490: Cervical
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2024-11-25 · BARTLEY, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionReopen
Why It Was Decided This Way
The appellant appeals through counsel a September 6,2023,Board of Veterans'Appeals (Board)decision finding no new and material evidence sufficient to reopen previously denied claims for service connection for a cervical spine disability and total hysterectomy.
In October 2007, the RO found no new and material evidence sufficient to reopen the claim.
In November 2018, the RO found no new and material evidence sufficient to reopen the claims.
In the September 2023 decision on appeal,the Board found that the July 2005 rating decision denying service connection for hysterectomy based on the lack of linkage to service and the October 2007 rating decision finding no new and material evidence to reopen were final.
The Board noted the veteran's statements asserting a link between her hysterectomy and cervical spine disability and service but found her not competent as a lay person to provide such a medical opinion.
Because the Board found these lay statements not competent, the Board also found that the statements could not establish that hysterectomy or cervical spine disability was incurred during or caused by her period of active service and did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims.
6 The Board noted that,although the veteran's December 2019 statement was not made on a VA Form 9 and her February 2020 VA Form 9 was not filed within one year of the November 2018 rating decision or 60 days of the October 2019 SOC,because the RO certified her appeal and the Board accepted and docketed the appeal,VA and the Board were estopped from pursuing untimeliness and the Board would review the merits.
Because the RO previously adjudicated entitlement to service connection for a cervical spine disability and hysterectomy in July 2005 and October 2007, the veteran must submit new and material evidence before the RO will consider the claims on the merits.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material|Duty To Assist
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →