CAVC Case 23-4815: Back

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2024-10-15 · MEREDITH, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Vacated / Remanded
Decision Date
2024-10-15
Judge
MEREDITH, Judge
Service Era
January 1966 to February 1974

Conditions Claimed

BackCervicalShoulder

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service Connection

Why It Was Decided This Way

He underwent a VA examination in November 2015 1 ;the examiner diagnosed bilateral shoulder strains and opined that the conditions are not related to service.

Regarding nexus,the examiner acknowledged the appellant's contention that he began having shoulder pain in 1981, but the examiner determined that the conditions were not likely related to service because it was not corroborated by the records.

The Board, in August 2022,found the November 2015 VA examiner's opinion to be inadequate,noting that the examiner had primarily relied on the absence of medical records in forming her negative nexus opinion,and the Board remanded the shoulder claims to obtain a new medical opinion.

The appellant underwent a second VA examination in November 2022;the examiner diagnosed bilateral shoulder strains and opined that the conditions are not related to service.

In explaining her negative nexus opinion,the examiner noted in part that there was no evidence of chronicity during service or after service, as would be expected if parachute jumps or physical training had caused a chronic shoulder disability.

The following month,the Board found that remand was required because the November 2022 opinion was inadequate,noting that the examiner had relied primarily on the absence of contemporaneous medical records to render a negative nexus opinion and that such an opinion is inadequate for adjudicative purposes.

In April 2023,the Board denied disability compensation for left and right shoulder conditions.

Specifically,he avers that the clinician primarily based her negative nexus opinion on the lack of contemporaneous medical records,even though the Board instructed that such reliance is improper.

Authorities Cited

Allday v. BrownArdison v. BrownBarr v. NicholsonDyment v. PrincipiEuzebio v. McEvans v. ShinsekiEvans v. WestFletcher v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiGill v. McHampton v. GoberKutscherousky v. WestMonzingo v. ShinsekiSee Breeden v. PrincipiSee Deloach v. ShinsekiSee Dyment v. WestSee Frankel v. DerwinskiSee Gill v. ShinsekiSee Hensley v. WestSee Kay v. PrincipiSee Martin v. Occupational Safety Health RevSee Quirin v. ShinsekiSee Tucker v. WestStefl v. NicholsonStegall v. WestVan Valkenburg v. Shinseki

Denial Type

No Nexus|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid