CAVC Case 23-3939: Back

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2025-02-28 · JAQUITH, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Vacated / Remanded
Decision Date
2025-02-28
Judge
JAQUITH, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

BackCervicalShoulderTDIUArthritisRadiculopathy

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Back ConditionService ConnectionEffective DateReopenTDIUIncreased Rating

Why It Was Decided This Way

In August 2020,the Board determined that new and material evidence had been received to reopen the claim for service connection for a cervical spine disorder, and the Board remanded that issue,as well as entitlement to an increased rating for a right shoulder disability and TDIU, 6 for new VA exams.

at 7739-42, which VA denied in a May 2017 rating decision because the evidence submitted was not new and material, R.

6 The Board concluded that TDIU has been found to be raised in the context of the [v]eteran's claim for an increased rating for a right shoulder disability.

The Board noted that the TDIU claim is derivative of the right shoulder increased rating claim,[so] the Board will consider whether 7 The veteran also attempted to appeal the 30% rating assigned for his right shoulder disability and the effective date chosen as the date of increase, R.

In the March 8,2023,decision on appeal,the Board denied an effective date prior to April 22,2016,for service connection for a cervical spine disability.

After acknowledging that VA had constructive possession of VA treatment records that were created prior to the expiration of the one-year appeal period of the December 2001 rating decision, the Board noted that it must therefore determine whether these records constituted new and material evidence because,if so,the December 2001 rating decision did not become final.

The Board concluded that although the July 25,2002,treatment report was new, it was not relevant, stating that [t]o be 'relevant' in the context of 38 C.

Because there was already a diagnosis of record, the Board found that the July 25,2002[,]record showing 'possible arthritis of the neck'was not material to the claim, so the December 2001 and January 2009 rating decisions are final.

Authorities Cited

Allday v. BrownBeraud v. McBond v. ShinsekiCaluza v. BrownClemons v. ShinsekiDavis v. McFletcher v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiHarris v. DerwinskiHart v. MansfieldHealey v. McHenderson v. WestIn Lang v. WilkieKisor v. McKisor v. WilkieLang v. WilkieLisio v. ShinsekiMahl v. PrincipiMedrano v. ShinsekiRice v. ShinsekiRobinson v. ShinsekiSee Andrews v. McSee Barringer v. PeakeSee Evans v. WestSee Medrano v. NicholsonSee Pederson v. McSee Robinson v. PeakeSee Tadlock v. McSmith v. GoberTucker v. West

Denial Type

Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid