CAVC Case 23-2946: Back
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2023-07-18 · JAQUITH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
BackCervicalKneeAnkleRespiratoryArthritis
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
SMCBack ConditionService ConnectionEffective DateKnee ConditionIncreased Rating
Why It Was Decided This Way
The Board noted the veteran's April 2018 submission of articles discussing the presence of benzene in groundwater located at the U.
The Board noted that for the period from October 31,2008,to December 23,2012,the June 2009 rating decision showed that a 10%rating had been assigned under DC 5260 for limitation of flexion,but the reasons and bases analysis in assigning the initial 10[%]rating[]show[ed]that the criteria of [DC]5003 [13] were used.
The Board concluded that a higher rating was not warranted for this time period because the left knee arthritis disability has been manifested by flexion greater than 60 degrees, extension less than 5 degrees[,]and painful motion,without ankylosis,dislocation or removal of semilunar cartilage,nonunion or malunion of the tibia and fibula,or genu recurvatum.
From December 24,2012,to January 4,2017, the Board found that the veteran's symptoms more closely approximate[d]the criteria under [DC] 5258 of dislocated semilunar cartilage with frequent episodes of 'locking,'pain,and effusion into the joint;therefore,a 20[%]disability rating is warranted.
Case:23-2946 Page: 11 of 21 Filed:09/30/2024 For the period from January 5,2017, to January 29,2017 (during which the veteran was in receipt of a 20%rating based on limited extension under DC 5261),the Board found that a change in the DC was warranted because DC 5258 rates on the symptoms the [v]eteran has (dislocation of semilunar cartilage with frequent episodes of pain,effusion into the joint,and limitation of flexion and extension to a noncompensable degree) and is both potentially and actually more favorable to the [v]eteran.
Finally,for the period beginning on March 1,2018,the Board determined that the left knee arthritis disability has been manifested by no more than intermediate degrees of residual weakness and painful limitation of motion.
January 2023 Board Decision In the January 17,2023, decision on appeal,the Board denied increased ratings for the veteran's left knee arthritis disability and service connection for squamous cell carcinoma.
In addressing the May 2022 JMPR,the Board found that a separate rating for left knee instability under DC 5257 was not warranted for the period from October 31,2008, to December 23,2012,explaining that [a]lthough the [v]eteran reported during the March 2009 VA examination that the left knee gave way,the VA examiner noted joint stability tests were all within normal limits after performing stability tests on several ligaments in the left knee.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Dismissed Procedural
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →