CAVC Case 23-2226: Psychiatric

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2024-07-31 · PIETSCH, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Remanded
Decision Date
2024-07-31
Judge
PIETSCH, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PsychiatricSleep ApneaHeadacheHeartRespiratoryArthritisHypertension

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionSleep Apnea

Why It Was Decided This Way

The appellant ,through counsel,appeals a March 3,2023, Board of Veterans'Appeals (Board)decision in which the Board denied entitlement to service connection for (1)obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)and (2) a heart disability.

The Board found the appellant competent to attest to factual matters of which he has first-hand knowledge.

at 3791-804,and the Board denied the claims in February 2020.

In February2021,the appellant submitted a brief to the Court,arguing that the VA negative nexus opinions were inadequate because they relied on the absence of objective medical evidence and failed to adequately address the lay evidence of record.

In the March 2023 decision,the Board denied the claims for service connection for OSA and a heart disability.

Sleep Apna The appellant contends that the September 2022VA opinions are inadequate and the Board erred in relying on these opinions,thereby failing to ensure that VA's duty to assist was satisfied.

The appellant also contends that the VA examiner did not address the fact that when [his] symptoms began during service he weighed between 155-162 pounds and did not drink alcohol, which suggests that weight gain and alcohol abuse may not be the cause of his OSA.

In addition,the appellant notes that while the VA examiner observed that snoring,insomnia and hypersomnolence,are not 'diagnostic of OSA'because a sleep study is required to diagnose OSA , the examiner did not address whether all his symptoms � to include daytime sleepiness;loud snoring;morning headaches;episodes in which he stopped breathing during sleep and awoke throughout the night, gasping or choking � when takentogether make it more likely than not that he had an onset of OSA during service that simply went undiagnosed because a sleep study was not performed.

Authorities Cited

Allday v. BrownBarr v. NicholsonBielby v. BrownBuchanan v. NicholsonCaluza v. BrownCiting Hyder v. DerwinskiColayong v. WestDalton v. NicholsonFletcher v. DerwinskiGabrielson v. BrownGilbert v. DerwinskiGurley v. NicholsonHarris v. DerwinskiHersey v. DerwinskHeuer v. BrownHickson v. WestJandreau v. NicholsonKinney v. McKutscherousky v. WestLayno v. BrownMiller v. WilkieMonzingo v. ShinsekiMoore v. NicholsonMoore v. ShinsekiReonal v. BrownRodriguez v. PeakeSee Best v. PrincipiSee Davidson v. ShinsekiSee Frankel v. DerwinskiSee Kay v. Principi

Denial Type

Non Denial Outcome

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid