BVA Case 22066507: Back

BVAReal Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · November 29, 2022 · SHEREEN M. MARCUS

Outcome
Denied
Decision Date
November 29, 2022
Judge
SHEREEN M. MARCUS
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

BackHipRespiratoryEye

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

BackHipRespiratoryEye

Why It Was Decided This Way

In a June 2016 rating decision, the RO declined to reopen the Veteran's claim finding no new and material evidence had been submitted.

The Veteran subsequently appealed and in a November 2018 Board decision, new and material evidence was found, and the Veteran's pulmonary condition claim was reopened.

A remand was then ordered for additional development to include obtaining a VA medical examination with a medical nexus opinion.

When there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding any issue material to the determination of the matter, the benefit of the doubt will be given to the veteran.

Following the Board's remand in September 2020, a new VA medical nexus opinion was obtained in January 2021.

The same examiner provided an additional medical opinion later in January 2021 including an identical negative nexus opinion for the Veteran's COPD.

Upon subsequent remand by the Board in November 2021, an additional medical nexus opinion was obtained in March 2022.

The examiner opined that the Veteran had no current diagnosis of any pulmonary disability that was as likely as not related to service.

Authorities Cited

Aries v. PeakeClemons v. ShinsekiDavidson v. ShinsekiHorn v. ShinsekiJandreau v. NicholsonKahana v. ShinsekiPrejean v. WestRobinson v. PeakeSee Barr v. NicholsonSee Bloom v. WestSee Layno v. BrownSee Lynch v. McSee Mozingo v. ShinsekiSee Scott v. McSee Stefl v. NicholsonSee Stegall v. WestShedden v. PrincipiWalker v. Shinseki

Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)

38 CFR 20.130338 CFR 3.10238 CFR 3.30338 CFR 3.303 (b)38 CFR 3.303(b)38 CFR 3.30738 CFR 3.309 (a)38 CFR 3.309(a)38 USC 111038 USC 111238 USC 510738 USC 5107(b)

Denial Type

No Nexus|Not New Material

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.