CAVC Case 22-7345: PTSD

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2022-11-03 · MEREDITH, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Vacated / Remanded
Decision Date
2022-11-03
Judge
MEREDITH, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PTSDDepressionAnxietyPsychiatricHearing LossSleep ApneaFibromyalgia

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionIncreased RatingHearing LossPTSDSleep Apnea

Why It Was Decided This Way

The examiner opined that the veteran's sleep apnea was not related to any type of [G]ulf [W]ar exposure event and that the condition was more likely caused by obesity.

As for the sleep apnea claim,the Board found that a medical opinion was necessary to address whether the [v]eteran's sleep apnea is due to or has been aggravated by his service-connected PTSD and/or fibromyalgia or medications prescribed to treat either disability.

In that regard,the clinician opined that the veteran's sleep apnea was not related to service,PTSD,or fibromyalgia,nor was it aggravated by PTSD or fibromyalgia.

In the November 2022 decision on appeal,the Board denied entitlement to disability compensation for sleep apnea,as well as initial PTSD ratings in excess of 30%prior to October 2, 2017,and in excess of 50%from October 2,2017, to June 28,2021,for substitution purposes.

In that regard,she avers that the veteran was not employed after March 2016 and that the Board erred to the extent that it found that he was employed at his church.

She also asserts that, although the Board found that the veteran was able to maintain relationships with his family members,the Board failed to consider whether those relationships were effective and whether he was able to establish new relationships.

Last,she asserts that the Board imposed too high a standard in denying a higher rating,as it found that the veteran had been able to work,obtain an employment offer,and complete training,but the Board did not consider whether he nonetheless had deficiencies in work.

The Board's determination of the proper disability rating is a finding of fact that the Court reviews under the clearly erroneous standard of review.

Authorities Cited

Allday v. BrownArdison v. BrownAries v. PeakeBankhead v. ShulkinBarr v. NicholsonBest v. PrincipiBuckley v. WestCaluza v. BrownClaudio v. ShinsekiEmerson v. McEuzebio v. McEvans v. ShinsekiFletcher v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiIn Garner v. TranKutscherousky v. WestMauerhan v. PrincipiMonzingo v. ShinsekiOwens v. BrownSee Deloach v. ShinsekiSee Frankel v. DerwinskiSee Kay v. PrincipiSee Martin v. Occupational Safety Health RevSee Pederson v. McSee Quirin v. ShinsekiSee Tucker v. WestStefl v. NicholsonWashington v. Nicholson

Denial Type

Credibility|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam|Rating Criteria

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid