CAVC Case 22-6596: Hearing Loss
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2021-11-17 · MEREDITH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionReopenHearing Loss
Why It Was Decided This Way
The appellant , through counsel appeals a November 17,2021, Board of Veterans'Appeals (Board)decision denying disability compensation for bilateral hearing loss and determining that new and material evidence had not been presented to reopen a claim for disability compensation for asthma.
For the following reasons,the Court will vacate the Board's decision determining that new and material evidence had not been presented to reopen the asthma claim,remand the vacated matter for further proceedings consistent with this decision,and affirm the Board's decision denying disability compensation for bilateral hearing loss.
His service records reflect treatment for various 1 The appellant,on March 17,2022,sought reconsideration of the November 17,2021,Board decision;the Chairman of the Board denied the motion on July 12,2022; and the appellant filed a Notice of Appeal on November 9, 2022.
The RO,in July 2008, declined to reopen the claim on the grounds that a VA treatment record was not considered new because it did not show any treatment for bronchial asthma and the appellant had not responded to a letter requesting that he submit new and material evidence.
Parties'Arguments The appellant first contends that, in determining that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen his claim for disability compensation for asthma,the Board failed to properly consider his 2021 testimony.
He also asserts that the VA medical records from 2009 to 2021 reflecting asthma diagnoses are new and material because the RO previously found that he did not have a current condition,and he asserts that the Board erred in finding that a current diagnosis had previously been established.
He concludes that, [b]ecause the Board failed to properly apply the new and material evidence standards .
, the Board failed to ensure it ordered a [VA] examination and instead relied on its own medical conclusion to determine that there was no nexus to service.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
No Nexus|Not New Material|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →