CAVC Case 22-6516: Back
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2022-09-01 · SCHOELEN
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
BackCervicalKneeArthritisRadiculopathy
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionEffective DateIncreased Rating
Why It Was Decided This Way
In May 2021,the Board denied entitlement to an initial evaluation in excess of 10%rating for the back condition prior to March 15,2019,and granted entitlement to initial ratings of 10%for radiculopathy of each lower extremity,effective February 27,2017.
In the JMPR,the parties agreed that in assessing the appellant's pre-March 15,2019,back condition,the Board failed to discuss favorable evidence (July 2014 range-of-motion findings).
Additionally,the parties agreed that in analyzing the appellant's pre-February 27,2017, bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy,the Board failed to discuss favorable evidence (November 2011 statement by the appellant and August 2015 medical records).
For the back condition,the Board found that,during the appeal period and prior to March 15,2019,forward flexion was less than 60 degrees but not limited to 30 degrees or less,and that there was no evidence of unfavorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine or incapacitating episodes lasting at least 6 weeks during a 12-month period.
The Board determined that the evidence showed consistent report[s]of back pain and that the March 2019 examination findings demonstrating limitation of flexion to 60 degrees or less should apply to the entire appeal period.
The Board determined that this finding was outweighed by the rest of the evidence of record and the evidence did not show favorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine.
The Board found that the range of motion was,at worst,45 degrees on forward flexion,and the symptoms did not approximate anyklosis.
The Board found that the appellant was also not entitled to a higher rating for IVDS.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Non Denial Outcome
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →