CAVC Case 22-491: Depression

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2021-09-28 · ALLEN, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Unknown
Decision Date
2021-09-28
Judge
ALLEN, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

DepressionAnxietyPsychiatricCervicalKneeSleep ApneaHipHeadacheRespiratoryEye

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionKnee ConditionSleep Apnea

Why It Was Decided This Way

3 Because the Board failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases supporting its findings denying service connection for both a psychiatric disability and OSA, and because it failed to ensure the duty to assist was satisfied with respect to the right knee condition,we will set aside those parts of the Board's decision and remand the matters for readjudication consistent with this decision.

4 The Secretary's duty to assist requires that he provide a VA medical examination to a claimant when there is (1)competent evidence of a current disability or persistent or recurrent symptoms of a disability;(2)evidence establishing that an event,injury,or disease occurred in service or,for certain diseases,manifestation of the disease during an applicable presumptive period for which the claimant qualifies;and (3)an indication that the disability or persistent or recurrent symptoms of the disability may be associated with the veteran's service or with another service-connected disability;but (4)insufficient competent medical evidence on file for the Secretary to make a decision on the claim.

Psychiatric Disability In the decision on appeal,the Board denied entitlement to service connection for a psychiatric disability because appellant presented normally on evaluation and denied depression, 4 38 U.

9 The Board found that appellant reported agitation,anxiety,and depression in 2018 and that she had a diagnosis of an anxiety disorder.

10 But the Board concluded that no evidence indicated any diagnosedcondition was related to service.

11 The Board also concluded that no VA examination was necessary to determine the etiology of appellant's psychiatric disability because no evidence indicated a nexus between the condition and service.

13 We agree with the parties that remand is required,but not for all the reasons appellant asserts.

The parties agree that the Board failed to address appellant's June 2020 report of a mental health concern of stress related to redeployment to Bosnia and her August 2020 report of experiencingtrauma duringservice when she was taken to a hospital in El Salvador and was unable to understand Spanish.

Authorities Cited

Allday v. BrownAries v. PeakeBarr v. NicholsonBest v. PrincipiBrannon v. WestBreniser v. ShinsekiBrokowski v. ShinsekiBuczynski v. ShinsekiFagan v. ShinsekiFrost v. ShulkinGarner v. TranGilbert v. DerwinskiHorn v. ShinsekiLendon v. NicholsonLocklear v. NicholsonLoving v. NicholsonQuirin v. ShinsekiRobinson v. PeakeRobinson v. ShinsekiRodriguez v. PeakeSee Ardison v. BrownSee Jensen v. BrownSee Robinson v. ShinsekiShinseki v. SandersSlaughter v. McStefl v. NicholsonTadlock v. McTucker v. WestWagner v. PrincipiWells v. Principi

Denial Type

No Nexus|Duty To Assist

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid