CAVC Case 22-4221: PTSD

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2022-05-11 · MEREDITH, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Affirmed
Decision Date
2022-05-11
Judge
MEREDITH, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PTSDPsychiatric

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionReopenPTSD

Why It Was Decided This Way

The VA examiner diagnosed an insomnia disorder but opined that [t]he timing of the onset of insomnia,combined with the lack of other trauma[-]related symptoms, indicates that insomnia is less likely than not related to military service and more likely related to other factors,including poor sleep hygiene.

2 After further development and procedural history,the Board,in November 2021,found that the prior VA examiners did not address the appellant's January 2016 report that he had nightmares and night sweats since the 1970s,and the Board remanded to obtain a VA addendum opinion,directing the psychiatrist or psychologist to consider and address the appellant's January 2016 statements.

A VA psychologist conducted a records review in December 2021 and provided a nexus opinion.

She further determined that the nightmares that the appellant reported experiencing since the 1970s were not related to the insomnia disorder or any other mental disorder because [a]symptom must cause clinically significant distress to meet [the]criteria for a mental disorder.

On May 11,2022,the Board denied disability compensation for an acquired psychiatric disorder,including PTSD and insomnia.

Parties'Arguments The appellant argues that the Board erred in relying on the March 2016 and January 2020 VA examination reports,which the Board previously found inadequate,and provided insufficient reasons for affording those reports probative value.

In that regard, he avers that those examiners failed to consider his lay statements regarding nightmares and night sweats .

Next,he contends that the Board erred in relying on the December 2021 VA opinion because the psychologist provided insufficient rationale for her negative nexus opinion and because the opinion did not comply with the Board's November 2021 remand.

Authorities Cited

Allday v. BrownAries v. PeakeBarr v. NicholsonCarr v. SaulDavidson v. ShinsekiGilbert v. DerwinskiGill v. McHampton v. GoberLocklear v. NicholsonMaggitt v. WestMorris v. McRusso v. BrownScott v. McSee Breeden v. PrincipiSee Dickens v. McSee Frankel v. DerwinskiSee Gill v. ShinsekiSee Slaughter v. McShedden v. PrincipiShinseki v. SandersStegall v. West

Denial Type

No Nexus|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid