CAVC Case 21-7351: PTSD

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2021-09-13 · BARTLEY, Chief Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Affirmed / Vacated / Remanded
Decision Date
2021-09-13
Judge
BARTLEY, Chief Judge
Service Era
March 1973 to October 1974

Conditions Claimed

PTSDDepressionAnxietyPsychiatricHearing LossTinnitusTDIU

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionEffective DateReopenTDIUHearing LossPTSD

Why It Was Decided This Way

1 In the same decision,the Board denied an evaluation in excess of 70%for PTSD on or after September 10, 2019.

The appellant had not submitted new and material evidence sufficient to reopen the psychiatric disorder claim because evidence submitted since the March 1982 rating decision did not show a mental health problem incurred or aggravated by service.

In August 2015,the RO found no new and material evidence sufficient to reopen the claim.

In February 2016, the RO acknowledged his PTSD diagnosis but did not consider the shipmate emails as new and material evidence to reopen the claim because the emails contained insufficient information to corroborate the claimed stressor or to allow VA to perform further development in an attempt to corroborate the claimed stressor.

In August 2019,the Board found that VA could not have obtained the Graham County deck logs previously because the appellant.

The Board found that entitlement to TDIU was reasonably raised,in accordance with Rice v.

In the September 2021 decision on appeal,the Board found the March 1982 and September 1999 rating decisions final.

at 25,the Board found that the September 1999 rating decision considered the discharge summary and therefore receipt of that record within 1 year of the March 1982 rating decision could not establish an earlier effective date for the award of service connection for PTSD.

Authorities Cited

Bankhead v. ShulkinBeraud v. McBlubaugh v. McCacciola v. GibsonCaluza v. BrownClaudio v. ShinsekiEmerson v. McEvans v. WestFletcher v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiHanson v. BrownHersey v. DerwinskiIn Bond v. ShinsekiIn Mitchell v. Mc[Appellant] v. TranKisor v. McKutscherousky v. WestLisio v. ShinsekiMauerhan v. PrincipiMayhue v. ShinsekiMittleider v. WestOwens v. BrownPickett v. McRice v. ShinsekiSee Davis v. WestSee Frankel v. DerwinskiSee Grivois v. BrownSee Hilkert v. WestSee Kay v. PrincipiSee Pederson v. Mc

Denial Type

Credibility|Not New Material

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid