BVA Case 21-6401: Depression

BVAReal Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · · DYK

Outcome
Unknown
Decision Date
Unknown
Judge
DYK
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

DepressionAnxietyPsychiatricBackEye

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

DepressionAnxietyPsychiatricBackEye

Why It Was Decided This Way

She argued that her claims remained open be- cause the VA had failed to address whether certain new evidence that she submitted within the relevant appeal pe- riod for her 1991 and 1995 Claims, including the 1993 Rec- ord, met the requirements of § 3.

Deal timely presented new and material evidence in 1997 of a psychi- atric disorder and the VA needed to treat this evidence as having been filed in connection with her 1995 Claim under § 3.

Deal’s re- quest for an effective date of October 1991, ruling that the alleged new and material evidence relating to her 1991 Claim, i.

Deal argued that the Board erred in ruling that the 1993 Record was not material.

constitutes new and material evidence re- lating to the old claim.

Deal argues that the Board did not address whether the 1993 Record was new and material evidence in connection with her 1991 Claim until June 2021.

COLLINS 6 The government responds that the VA’s delay in ad- dressing whether evidence submitted during the appeal pe- riod of a prior claim is new and material under § 3.

Instead, the claimant may only be entitled to an earlier effective date if, on re- mand, the VA determines that the proffered evidence is new and material and reconsiders the prior claim accord- ingly.

Authorities Cited

Beraud v. McBond v. Shinseki

Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)

38 CFR 3.156(b)38 USC 729238 USC 7292(a)38 USC 7292(d)(2)

Denial Type

Not New Material

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.