BVA Case 21-5726: Back

Real Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · March 1,2023 · LAURER, Judge

Outcome
Unknown
Decision Date
March 1,2023
Judge
LAURER, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

BackHearing_LossTinnitusHeadache

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionHearing Loss

Why It Was Decided This Way

1 Appellant asks the Court to reverse the Board�s finding that VA satisfied its duty to assist.

Legal Landscape VA has a duty to assist veterans in developing their claims.

5 VA must provide a medical exam when there is (1)competent evidence of a current disability or recurrent or persistent symptoms of a disability,(2)evidence that an event,injury,or disease occurred in service,(3)an indication that the current disability (or persistent or recurrent symptoms of a disability)may be associated with the veteran�s service ,and (4)insufficient medical evidence to decide the claim.

6 The Board must provide reasons and bases explaining its decision to refuse to provide an exam, 7 and the Court reviews that decision under the � arbitrary,capricious,abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law � standard.

�� 13 The Court us es the �clearly erroneous�standard to review the Board�s determinations about whether VA satisfied the duty to assist.

91,94 (1992)(�A factual finding �is �clearly erroneous�when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.

�� 2 The Board,as factfinder,weighs the evidence � including the probative value of medical evidence and the credibility of lay evidence � in the first instance.

15 To assess credibility,the Board can consider self-interest, 16 missing contemporaneous evidence,conflicting statements, bias,and the passage of time since service.

Authorities Cited

Acevedo v. ShinsekiAllday v. BrownArdison v. BrownAries v. PeakeAtilano v. McBarr v. NicholsonBuchanan v. NicholsonCartwright v. DerwinskiCoburn v. NicholsonCray v. WilkieDeloach v. ShinsekiDuenas v. PrincipiEuzebio v. McEvans v. McEvans v. WestFountain v. McGreen v. DerwinskiGutierrez v. PrincipiHensley v. BrownHersey v. DerwinskiHilkert v. WestHorn v. ShinsekiJandreau v. NicholsonJohnson v. BrownLane v. PrincipiLendon v. NicholsonMiller v. WilkieMonzingo v. ShinsekiNolen v. GoberOwens v. Brown

Denial Type

Credibility|No Nexus|Preponderance Against|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →