CAVC Case 21-5718: PTSD
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2021-04-30 · MEREDITH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
PTSDDepressionAnxietyPsychiatricHeadacheTDIU
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionEffective DateIncreased RatingPTSD
Why It Was Decided This Way
For the following reasons,the Court will vacate the Board's decision to the extent that the Board failed to address the reasonably raised issue of entitlement to secondary service connection for dental issues,and that part of the Board's decision denying a disability rating in excess of 30%for PTSD for the period prior to January 2,2015;and the Court will remand those matters for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
In that regard,the Board determined that the evidence indicated possible worsening of the appellant's PTSD since the 2016 VA examination and that a new VA examination was necessary.
On April 30,2021,the Board denied a rating in excess of 30%for PTSD prior to January 2, 2015,and awarded a 70% rating,but no higher, for PTSD thereafter.
The Board's determination of the proper disability rating is a finding of fact that the Court reviews under the clearly erroneous standard of review.
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when the Court,after reviewing the entire evidence, is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
As with any material issue of fact or law,the Board must provide a statement of reasons or bases that is adequate to enable a claimant to understand the precise basis for the Board's decision,as well as to facilitate review in this Court.
PTSD Rating Prior to January 2, 2015 The appellant argues that the Board failed to discuss the November 2012 VA examination report,which,he asserts,the Board was required to address in order to create a consistent disability picture throughout the period on appeal.
He also argues that the Board failed to address facial inconsistencies in the November 2014 VA examination report,address the adequacy of that examination in light of the January 2015 private 7 counseling report,and consider favorable findings from the November 2014 report.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|Rating Criteria
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →