CAVC Case 21-5701: Knee
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2021-06-04 · PIETSCH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
KneeGITDIUArthritisErectile Dysfunction
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionReopenTDIUIncreased Rating
Why It Was Decided This Way
In a March 2 2013 rating decision,a VA regional office (RO) denied service connection for an endocrine system disorder and right knee disorder and found no new and material evidence had been presented to reopen a claim for a left knee disorder.
The Board explained that a January 2001 rating decision denying service connection for knee disorders had never become final,and therefore the Board did not have to consider whether new and material evidence had been submitted.
The appellant's ED was likely caused by his endocrine disorder and was not related to service.
May 2019 Board Remand In May 2019,the Board remanded the matter of service connection for an endocrine system disorder,finding that the December 2016 examiner failed to address the December 2011 VA physician's statement and the veteran's August 2014 research submission showing connections between pituitary dysfunction and head injuries,which the veteran suffered in service.
The Board found the issue of service connection for ED intertwined with the endocrine system claim because the appellant.
June 2021 Board Decision In the June 2021 decision on appeal, the Board denied service connection for an endocrine system disorder,relying on the July 2020 VA examiner's opinion that the veteran's endocrine disorder resulted from a pituitary tumor,which was not related to in-service head trauma,and was less likely than not related to service.
The Board denied service connection for ED,relying on the January 2020 examiner's opinion that the veteran's ED was related to his endocrine disorder and was not at least as likely as not directly related to service.
The appellant's endocrine disorder was not service connected, the Board concluded that secondary service-connection was not warranted as a matter of law.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Non Denial Outcome
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →