CAVC Case 21-5002: Back
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2021-04-19 · SCHOELEN
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
BackCervicalKneeAnkleSkinGIArthritisHypertension
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService Connection
Why It Was Decided This Way
Whether a medical opinion is adequate is a finding of fact,which this Court reviews under the 'clearly erroneous'standard.
As with any material issue of fact or law, the Board must provide a statement of the reasons or bases for its determination adequate to enable a claimant to understand the precise basis for the Board's decision,as well as to facilitate review in this Court.
The examiner concluded that the appellant's bilateral knee degenerative joint disease and low back condition were less likely than not related to service because he is obese,and the increased weight coupled with his age is more than likely responsible for his increased risk and arthritis findings in his knees and back.
In the decision on appeal,the Board found that the February and August 2020 VA opinions the most probative evidence because the examiners had reviewed the claims file and provided detailed and well-supported rationales.
Relying on the 2020 VA opinions to deny service connection for bilateral knee and low back conditions,the Board concluded that the preponderance of the evidence was against the claims.
He alleges that the August 2020 examiner overreached and made a credibility determination,failed to address relevant lay statements, relied solely on the absence of documentation, and did not address whether obesity caused by his thyroid condition was an intermediate step to causing his knee and back conditions.
In the alternative,the appellant argues that the Board failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for relying on the February 2020 and August 2020 medical opinions.
The Secretary concedes that the 2020 medical opinions are inadequate because the examiner failed to address pertinent lay statements.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|Preponderance Against|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam|No Current Disability
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →