CAVC Case 21-4066: PTSD
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2021-05-22 · MOORMAN
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
PTSDDepressionAnxietyKneeHearing LossTinnitusAnkleSkinDiabetesEye
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionKnee ConditionIncreased RatingHearing LossPTSD
Why It Was Decided This Way
In the May 2021 decision here on appeal, the Board denied the appellant.
of (1)a current disability,(2)incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury in service,and (3)a nexus between the claimed in-service injury or disease and the current disability.
To satisfy its duty to assist,VA must provide a medical examination where there is competent evidence that the claimant has a current disability, or persistent or recurrent symptoms of disability and the evidence indicates that the disability or symptoms may be associated with the claimant's active military, naval,air,or space service but there is insufficient medical evidence for the Secretary to make a decision on the claim.
The third McLendon element requires only that the evidence 'indicates'that there 'may'be a nexus between the [first] two [elements].
159(c)(4),it must provide a written statement of the reasons or bases for its conclusion pursuant to 38 U.
The appellant argues that the Board erred when it found that a VA examination was not warranted for his hormone imbalance claim.
The Board found that the appellant has a current disability of diabetes,and the Board presumed,for the purpose of its decision,that he has a disability that caused infertility, but the Board found that his claimed hair loss is not a disability for compensation purposes.
Accordingly, the Board found that the evidence showed both current disabilities and in-service events.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
No Nexus|Preponderance Against|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam|Rating Criteria
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →