CAVC Case 21-2416: Psychiatric
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2020-12-10 · PIETSCH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionEffective DateTDIUIncreased Rating
Why It Was Decided This Way
In January 2020,the Board denied the claim for an effective date earlier than December 13, 2005,for service connection for bronchial asthma.
The director observed that the Board had provided the appellant the benefit of the doubt when assigning a 60 percent [rating] from December 23,2006,even though he did not start prednisone course until months later.
In the December 2020 decision we consider here on appeal, the Board noted that before March 5,2011,the appellant was service connected for bronchial asthma,rated as 30%disabling from December 2005 to December 2006, 60%disabling from December 2006 to May 2008,and then again as 30%disabling,from June 2008 through March 2011.
3 The Board noted that from May 2005,the date the appellant reportedly became too disabled to work,to December 2006,and from June 2008 through March 2011, the appellant's combined rating was no more than 40%.
The Board noted the October 2020 memorandum in response to the referral,noting that the Director of the Compensation Service found insufficient evidence that the appellant's service-connected disabilities prevented substantially gainful employment prior to March 5,2011,and determined that a TDIU should not be granted on an extra-schedular basis.
The Board determined that the appellant's service-connected disabilities did not meet the scheduler rating requirement for a TDIU from May 5,2005 to December 22,2006,and from June 1,2008 to March 4, 2011,but they did meet these schedular rating requirements from December 23,2006,to May 31,2008,because they derive from a common etiology or affect the same bodily system (respiratory system)and,thus, in making this determination,they may be considered as one,collective, disability.
The Board ultimately concluded that the preponderance of the evidence is against finding that before March 5, 2011,the appellant's service-connected disabilities precluded him from obtaining or maintaining substantially gainful employment when considering his level of education,prior work experience and training.
The Court reviews the Board's TDIU determinations under the clearly erroneous standard applicable to factual issues.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|Not Service Connected|Preponderance Against
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →