BVA Case 200901-107174: PTSD

BVAReal Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · March 26, 2024 · Vito A. Clementi

Outcome
Granted / Denied / Remanded
Decision Date
March 26, 2024
Judge
Vito A. Clementi
Service Era
March 1992 to May 1993

Conditions Claimed

PTSDDepressionAnxietyPsychiatricBackCervicalKneeHipSkinHeart

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

PTSDDepressionAnxietyPsychiatricBackCervicalKneeHip

Why It Was Decided This Way

The Veteran was notified of the denial in an October 2016 letter and did not initiate an appeal or submit new and material evidence within one year.

Although notified of this decision by an October 2010 letter, the Veteran did not initiate an appeal or submit new and material evidence within one year of the rating decision.

In an October 2016 rating decision, the RO denied reopening of the claim because the evidence submitted was not new and material.

303 (b), are capable of service connection based on a continuity of symptomatology without respect to an established causal nexus to service.

The Board must analyze the competency and credibility of the evidence, account for the evidence which it finds to be persuasive or unpersuasive and provide the reasons for its rejection of any material favorable to the claimant.

Credibility is a factual determination - it involves deciding whether the testimony or other evidence is believable, and the determination is made after the evidence has been found competent.

When there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding the merits of an issue material to the determination of the matter, the benefit of the doubt in resolving each such issue shall be given to the claimant.

Although the Veteran is competent to report observable symptomatology of her disorder and to relate a contemporaneous medical diagnosis, she is not competent to render a nexus opinion or attempt to present lay assertions to establish a nexus between her current rectus diastasis diagnosis and its relationship to her active service.

Authorities Cited

Barr v. NicholsonBurton v. ShinsekiCombee v. BrownEsteban v. BrownGabrielson v. BrownGilbert v. DerwinskiHart v. MansfieldHatlestad v. BrownJandreau v. NicholsonKahana v. ShinsekiLayno v. BrownLendon v. NicholsonLuca v. BrownLynch v. McRice v. ShinsekiRucker v. BrownSee Brammer v. DerwinskiSee Fenderson v. WestSee Gonzales v. WestSee Hart v. MansfieldSee Mitchell v. ShinsekiSee Timberlake v. GoberSee Walker v. ShinsekiVan Hoose v. BrownWalker v. ShinsekiWaters v. Shinseki

Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)

38 CFR 20.110338 CFR 20.130338 CFR 20.30038 CFR 20.30138 CFR 3.10238 CFR 3.103 (c)(2)(ii)38 CFR 3.10438 CFR 3.104 (a)38 CFR 3.104(c)38 CFR 3.15638 CFR 3.156(c)(1)(2)38 CFR 3.156(d)38 CFR 3.250138 CFR 3.303 (a)38 CFR 3.303 (b)38 CFR 3.303 (d)38 CFR 3.30738 CFR 3.309 (a)38 CFR 3.34038 CFR 3.341

Denial Type

Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material|Preponderance Against|Duty To Assist

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.