CAVC Case 20-7943: PTSD
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2020-07-24 · JAQUITH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
PTSDAnxietyPsychiatricHearing LossTinnitusSleep ApneaSkinHeartDiabetesGI
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionReopenHearing LossPTSDSleep Apnea
Why It Was Decided This Way
Many of these conditions couldbe service connected on a presumptive,direct,or secondary basis upon demonstration that the veteran served in Vietnam � but the Board failed to adequately discuss whether VA fulfilled its duty to assist the veteran in developing his claim by corroborating his Vietnam service.
In an October 2009 decision,VA denied every one of his claims for lack of in-service occurrence and nexus.
3 In its July 24,2020, decision,the Board determined that VA hadn't received new and material evidence sufficient to reopen the seizure,diabetes, CVA,hypertension,and CAD claims.
And as for the remaining disabilities,the Board explained that the record hasn't established onset during service,continuity of symptoms,or nexus to service ,nor can they be service connected secondary to CVA or an acquired psychiatric disorder because initial service connection hasn't been established for those two conditions.
Lastly,the Board found that the duty to further assist the veteran hadn't been triggered because of the veteran's significant credibility issues and unsupportive medical evidence.
ANALYSIS The veteran alleges, inter alia ,that the Board failed to ensure that VA fulfilled its duty to assist him in developing his claims for the right and left arm disability, right eye disability,tinnitus, sleep disorder,gastrointestinal disability,scars,and acquired psychiatric disability.
The Secretary has a duty to assist the veteran in obtaining evidence necessary to substantiate his claim,including making reasonable efforts to obtain all potentially relevant records that the appellant adequately identifies and authorizes the Secretary to gather.
In cases where VA has a heightened duty to assist based on lost service records,that duty includes (1) advising the claimant to submit alternative forms of supportive evidence and assisting the claimant in obtaining that alternative evidence, Washington , 19 Vet.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material|Duty To Assist
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →