CAVC Case 20-5820: Back
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2020-05-06 · PIETSCH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
BackKneeAnkleArthritisRadiculopathy
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionReopenKnee Condition
Why It Was Decided This Way
PIETSCH, Judge :The appellant appeals the May 6,2020,Board of Veterans'Appeals (Board)decision in which the Board denied the petitions to reopen the previously denied claims of entitlement to service connection for a low back disability,left ankle disability,and right ankle disability,and granted the petitions to reopen the previously denied claims for entitlement to service connection for a left knee disability and right knee disability.
In the May 2020 decision,the Board denied the petitions to reopen the previously denied claims of entitlement to service connection for a low back,left ankle and right ankle disability.
Specifically,the Board found that the unappealed December 2013 rating decision denied 3 service connection for a low back,left ankle,and right ankle disability,and new and material evidence was not received prior to expiration of the appeal period.
PARTIES'ARGUMENTS The appellant contends that [t]he Board erred in failing to provide adequate reasons and bases for its determination that new and material evidence had not been received sufficient to reopen these claims.
With regard to his petition to reopen the left and right ankle claims,the appellant maintains that the December 2013 denial was predicated on both a lack of nexus to [his]military service,and the lack of an underlying diagnosis.
According to the appellant, [b]y discounting this evidence due to a lack of nexus,the Board has held [him]to a standard beyond that set forth in regulation and defined by this Court in Shade .
With regard to the claimed low back condition, the appellant also contends that the Board erred in failing to provide adequate reasons and bases for its determination that new and material evidence had not been received sufficient to reopen this claim.
The appellant maintains that the December 2013 denial of this claim was also predicated on a lack of nexus to [a]ppellant's military service,and the lack of an underlying diagnosis.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Non Denial Outcome
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →