BVA Case 20-3886: PTSD

BVAReal Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · · MOORE, Chief Judge

Outcome
Unknown
Decision Date
Unknown
Judge
MOORE, Chief Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PTSDAnxietyPsychiatricEye

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

PTSDAnxietyPsychiatricEye

Why It Was Decided This Way

Be- cause we find no legal error in the Veterans Court’s interpretation of its standard of review and the benefit of the doubt rule, we affirm.

The Board found that the preponderance of evidence supported a finding that Mr.

The Veterans Court found no error in the Board’s application of the benefit of the doubt rule under 38 U.

Section 5107(b) provides that “[w]hen there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding any issue mate- rial to the determination of a matter, the Secretary shall give the benefit of the doubt to the claimant.

” In other words, if the competing evidence is in “approximate bal- ance” or “nearly equal,” then the benefit of the doubt rule requires the Board to rule in favor of the veteran.

The Veterans Court concluded that this “finding is not clearly erroneous.

And thus, the benefit of the doubt doctrine does not apply here.

A This case is another in a series challenging various as- pects of the benefit of the doubt rule.

Authorities Cited

Bazalo v. WestBowling v. McDixon v. McEuzebio v. McInc v. United StatesLynch v. McMattox v. McRoane v. McSee Tadlock v. Mc

Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)

38 USC 5107(b)38 USC 7261(b)(1)38 USC 7292(d)(2)

Denial Type

Preponderance Against

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.