CAVC Case 20-2125: Back
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2020-01-06 · MEREDITH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionEffective DateTDIUIncreased Rating
Why It Was Decided This Way
In January 2020, the Board denied entitlement to disability compensation for a dental condition, denied an initial disability rating in excess of 10% for a left wrist disability,declined to take jurisdiction over the issue of entitlement to TDIU,and referred a claim for VA outpatient dental treatment to the AOJ for further referral to the appropriate VA medical facility.
The Board concluded,however,that the TDIU issue was not before the Board because the appellant did not challenge the 2018 rating decision that denied entitlement to TDIU and he did not indicate that he was unemployable solely because of his left wrist disability.
On appeal,the parties agree that the Board erred when it declined to exercise jurisdiction over the issue of TDIU.
Further,the Court will accept the Secretary's additional concession that the Board erred to the extent that it required TDIU to be based solely on the appellant's left wrist disability.
VA Outpatient Dental Treatment The appellant argues that the Board erred when it referred the issue of entitlement to VA outpatient dental treatment to the AOJ and that the Court has jurisdiction to review the Board's referral decision.
Here,the Court agrees with the appellant and concludes that the Board erred when it referred the matter of outpatient treatment to the AOJ,where the appellant's claim for benefits for a dental condition necessarily includes a claim for outpatient dental services.
at 201-02 (holding that the Court had authority to modify a Board decision to reflect remand rather than referral of part of a claim for benefits when the Board denied another part of that claim).
Disability Compensation for a Dental Disability It is the Board's responsibility,as factfinder, to determine the credibility and weight to be given to the evidence.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|Preponderance Against
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →