BVA Case 190916-30775: PTSD

BVAReal Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · May 1, 2024 · B. MULLINS

Outcome
Granted / Denied / Remanded
Decision Date
May 1, 2024
Judge
B. MULLINS
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PTSDAnxietyPsychiatricBackCervicalTinnitusShoulderHipHeadacheSkin

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

PTSDAnxietyPsychiatricBackCervicalTinnitusShoulderHip

Why It Was Decided This Way

The rating of ten percent for right index finger scarring from July 31, 2006, to July 26, 2016, was not clearly erroneous, has already been restored, and since July 26, 2016, the right thumb and index finger scars are properly combined and a separate compensable rating for right index finger scarring is denied.

If evidence was submitted either (1) during the period after the AOJ issued the decision on appeal and prior to the Board hearing, or (2) more than 90 days following the hearing, the Board did not consider it in its decision.

A grant for service connection for a disability requires: (1) a present disability or persistent or recurrent symptoms of a disability; (2) an in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury; and (3) a causal relationship ("nexus") between the present disability and the in-service event, injury, or disease.

However, a disability, with no causal relationship ("nexus") to an in-service event can be considered service-connected by being proximately due to or aggravated by a service-connected disease or injury.

To establish secondary service connection there must be (1) evidence of a current disability; (2) evidence of a service-connected disability; and (3) competent evidence establishing a link ("nexus") between the service-connected disability and the current disability.

2006) ("[T]he Board cannot determine that lay evidence lacks credibility merely because it is unaccompanied by contemporaneous medical evidence").

The examiner noted that there was no sufficient evidence of a causative or permanently aggravated nexus between a right-hand injury, carpal tunnel syndrome or lateral epicondylitis and a shoulder strain condition.

When there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding the merits of an issue material to the determination of the matter, the Veteran shall be afforded the benefit of the doubt and prevail upon the issue.

Authorities Cited

Amin v. ShinsekiArdison v. BrownBuchanan v. NicholsonCorreia v. McEsteban v. BrownFenderson v. WestGonzales v. WestHart v. MansfieldJandreau v. NicholsonLendon v. NicholsonLuca v. BrownRodriguez v. PeakeRucker v. BrownSchafrath v. DerwinskiSee Acevedo v. ShinsekiSee Barr v. NicholsonSee Gonzales v. WestSee Harris v. DerwinskiSee Lynch v. McSee Mitchell v. ShinsekiSee Timberlake v. GoberSee Wallin v. WestSee White v. IllinoisStefl v. NicholsonWalker v. Shinseki

Regulations Cited (38 CFR / 38 USC)

38 CFR 20.130338 CFR 20.30038 CFR 20.302(a)38 CFR 3.10238 CFR 3.103(c)(2)(ii)38 CFR 3.15938 CFR 3.159(c)(4)(i) (2018)38 CFR 3.159(e)38 CFR 3.250138 CFR 3.30338 CFR 3.303(a)38 CFR 3.31038 CFR 4.138 CFR 4.11838 CFR 4.1438 CFR 4.2738 CFR 4.4038 CFR 4.4538 CFR 4.5938 CFR 4.7

Denial Type

Credibility|No Nexus|Duty To Assist

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.