CAVC Case 17-4391: PTSD

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2017-09-19 · MEREDITH, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Affirmed / Remanded / Vacated
Decision Date
2017-09-19
Judge
MEREDITH, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PTSDAnxietyPsychiatricBackHeadacheRespiratoryGIEyeArthritisHypertension

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionEffective DateReopenIncreased RatingPTSD

Why It Was Decided This Way

hat condition encompassed claims for benefits for all of his cardiovascular conditions and that the Board failed to consider entitlement to benefits for those conditions.

He does not argue that the Board erred in denying him benefits for hypertension specifically.

The RO declined to reopen the claim in February 2002,finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted.

In the September 2017 decision on appeal,the Board determined that a compensable disability rating of 30% was only warranted for the period between February 20,2007,and March 9,2008,based on the February 2007 VA medical examination.

The Board denied entitlement to a compensable initial disability rating between December 2,1997,and February 19, 2007,and from March 10,2008,finding that the vast majority of .

In a March 2014 VA hypertension examination report,the examiner concluded that hypertension was not related to sarcoidosis or Reiter's syndrome.

In the decision on appeal,the Board denied benefits for hypertension,finding no evidence that hypertension was related to service or to any service-connected disabilities.

In the February 2002 rating decision,the RO declined to reopen the claim,finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted.

Authorities Cited

Allday v. BrownAnderson v. ShinsekiBarringer v. PeakeBerger v. BrownBond v. DerwinskiBrokowski v. ShinsekiBuckley v. WestButts v. BrownClemons v. ShinsekiColvin v. DerwinskiEddy v. BrownEsteban v. BrownEvans v. ShinsekiFletcher v. DerwinskiFountain v. McGilbert v. DerwinskiHampton v. GoberHenderson v. WestHodge v. WestHorn v. ShinsekiJandreau v. NicholsonJordan v. BrownKutscherousky v. WestLisio v. ShinsekiMurray v. ShinsekiOrtiz v. PrincipiOwens v. BrownRobinson v. PeakeRobinson v. ShinsekiSee Breeden v. Principi

Denial Type

Credibility|Not New Material|Cue

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid