CAVC Case 17-3598: Depression
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2017-06-13 · SCHOELEN, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
DepressionPsychiatricBackDiabetesArthritisHypertension
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService Connection
Why It Was Decided This Way
The appellant , through counsel,appeals a June 13,2017,Board of Veteran's Appeals (Board)decision in which the Board denied service connection for an inguinal hernia and back disability.
Because the Board failed to provide adequate reasons or bases for its decision,the Court will vacate the Board's decision and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
In the June 13,2017,decision here on appeal,the Board denied the appellant's claim for service connection for an inguinal hernia,concluding that this disorder did not manifest during service and was not caused by any in-service disease,injury,or event.
In reaching this determination,the Board found that VA met its duty to assist to retrieve the appellant's relevant medical records.
The Secretary's duty to assist requires that he provide a VA medical examination to a claimant when there is (1) competent evidence of a current disability or persistent or recurrent symptoms of a disability;(2)evidence establishing that an event,injury, or disease occurred in service or,for certain diseases, manifestation of the disease during an applicable presumptive period for which the claimant qualifies;and (3)an indication that the disability or persistent or recurrent symptoms of the disability may be associated with the veteran's service or with another service-connected disability;but (4) insufficient competent medical evidence on file for the Secretary to make a decision on the claim.
This determination is reviewed by the Court under the clearly erroneous standard of review.
This is a classic factual assessment,involving the weighing of facts,and the Board's findings are subject to the 'clearly erroneous'standard of review.
[T]his element requires only that the evidence 'indicates'that there 'may'be a nexus between the two.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →