CAVC Case 17-1569: Depression
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2017-01-30 · MEREDITH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
DepressionPsychiatricBackCervicalShoulderArthritisRadiculopathy
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionReopen
Why It Was Decided This Way
The appellant , through counsel appeals a January 30,2017,Board of Veterans'Appeals (Board)decision that found that no new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen a previously denied claim for benefits for a low back disorder and denied entitlement to benefits for a mental or mood disorder,including as secondary to a low back disorder.
For the following reasons,the Court will vacate that part of the Board's decision that found that no new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen the previously denied claim for benefits for a low back disorder and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
S Naval Medical Board determined that the appellant's chronic back pain with spondylolysis at the L5-S1 vertebrae existed prior to his entry to service and was not aggravated by service.
The Medical Board noted that the appellant's back pain had begun 6 months earlier during training and that he had no back pain prior to that time.
In January 2017,the Board issued the decision on appeal,finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the appellant's previously denied claim for benefits for a low back disorder.
Of note,the Board determined that no medical examination related to the appellant's claim for benefits for a mental disorder was necessary.
ANALYSIS On appeal,the appellant argues that the Board failed to account for his lay statements in May 2008 and September 2009 that he did not have spondylolysis prior to service,and therefore the Board provided inadequate reasons or bases for its determination that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the previously denied claim for benefits for spondylolysis.
He next contends that the Board provided inadequate reasons or bases for denying entitlement to benefits for a psychiatric condition because the Board failed to consider that he received substance abuse treatment in service.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →