BVA Case 16-3738: Back

In July 2007, the appellant underwent another VA examination with the same examiner, who diagnosed the appellant with lumbosacral strain with minimal arthritis and reiterated his opinion that this condition was not related to service.

In May 2009, the Board denied the appellant's claim of entitlement to disability compensation for a low back disorder.

In December 2011,the same examiner who provided the May 2006 and July 2007 VA medical opinions,upon review of the claims file,diagnosed the appellant with spinal stenosis and opined that it was less likely than not related to service but natural age progression.

Upon review of the record and interview of the appellant,the examiner diagnosed him with degenerative disk disease (DDD),opining that spinal stenosis and DDD are less likely than not related to an acute back strain that occurred more than 30 years prior to his next back complaint and even further from the time of a diagnosis of spinal stenosis.

The examiner opined: There are no medical records of evidence from 1970-2004 to establish a nexus therefore it would be less likely than not that the [appellant's]spinal stenosis is related to the injury he describes .

On October 13,2016,the Board denied the appellant's claim for disability compensation for a low back disability.

ANALYSIS The appellant argues,essentially,that the Board erred in (1)relying upon medical opinions that are inadequate and failed to substantially comply with the Board's prior remand directives, and (2)failing to provide adequate reasons or bases in support of its finding that lay statements by the appellant and G.

Duty To Assist [O]nce the Secretary undertakes the effort to provide an examination [or opinion] when developing a service-connection claim,.