CAVC Case 16-2080: PTSD

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2016-05-20 · BARTLEY, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Affirmed
Decision Date
2016-05-20
Judge
BARTLEY, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PTSDPsychiatricDiabetesHypertension

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionReopenPTSD

Why It Was Decided This Way

In April 2009, the RO denied reopening the schizophrenia claim,indicating that evidence reviewed included October 1976 to April 2008 treatment records,which were not new and material.

The veteran appealed and in January 2012 the Board denied reopening the schizophrenia claim.

In October 2012,the RO issued decisions finding no new and material evidence sufficient to reopen the schizophrenia claim,R.

The RO issued a May 2014 Statement of the Case (SOC)continuing to deny service connection for PTSD and schizophrenia,finding no new and material evidence sufficient to reopen the claims.

The representative also 2 asserted that a letter from the Army indicated that the veteran was discharged in 1979 and thus it was unclear why his psychiatric disorder was not service connected.

The May 2016 Board decision on appeal found no new and material evidence to reopen the claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder,to include schizophrenia and PTSD.

The Board found most of the personnel records not new and the remainder not material,stating that an Article 15 punishment noting failures to report for duty in April 1974 did not support the veteran's contentions of an in-service psychiatric disorder.

The Board concluded that new VA and private medical records and SSA records were cumulative because they showed current treatment for a psychiatric disability, an element of service connection already established,without showing linkage between the disability and service, the element of service connection not yet established.

Authorities Cited

Breeden v. PrincipiCacciola v. GibsonGilbert v. DerwinskiNewhouse v. NicholsonPederson v. McSee Frankel v. DerwinskiSee Howard v. GoberSee Prillman v. PrincipiShinseki v. SandersVogan v. Shinseki

Denial Type

Not Service Connected|Not New Material

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid